- #HIVEBENCH ELSEVIER HOW TO#
- #HIVEBENCH ELSEVIER FREE#
This tool will be integrated into Elsevier’s existing Research Data Management portfolio, resulting in the further enhancement of the researcher experience. Google has launched Science Journal, which is not a science journal.Elsevier, a world-leading provider of scientific, technical and medical information products and services, announced today the acquisition of Hivebench, the flagship product of researcher application developer Shazino, based in Lyon, France.
#HIVEBENCH ELSEVIER FREE#
(Public Understanding of Science, sub req’d, now free to access) On television, “ researchers use personal accounts as a way of reframing news stories introduced by the program hosts,” says Rony Armon.“Gene editing can drive science to openness,” says Kevin Esvelt.“ How long does it take to do a PhD?” asks The Thesis Whisperer.Want to be an entrepreneur on the side? Adriene Koh has some suggestions.Jill O’Neill wonders why we’re not talking about what the scholarly record is becoming.
“How did something as truly awful as panel discussions become the default format?” asks Duncan Green. Why are so many researchers moving to Qatar? Sarah Huggett and Lucy Goodchild van Hilten try to find out. Elsevier has acquired Hivebench, a lab notebook tool. “In all disciplines, first and last authors typically contribute to more tasks than middle authors,” reports a new preprint. A University of Missouri employee embezzled more than $740,000 over 15 years from a research center, Rudi Keller of the Columbia Tribune reports. What role do patents play in the reproducibility crisis? Jacob Sherkow takes a look in an SSRN preprint. “Who wrote that op-ed?” asks Paul Farhi of The Washington Post. “This is not a simple story of author financial conflicts of interest, but rather a complex tale of ghost management of the entire process of bringing a drug to market.” A recent paper in Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance. “How one California university faked students’ scores, skated by immigration authorities - and made a fortune in the process.” Molly Hensley-Clancy has the story for BuzzFeed. A piece in Cancer Cytopathology highlights the growing trend of predatory journals. NIH decides to determine if there is a racial bias in its grantsmaking process. Ranjit Chandra, found guilty of committing misconduct, failed to appeal the loss of a libel suit he brought against the CBC in time. A graduate student at the University of Colorado, Boulder wants the university “ to adopt a campus-wide transparent research policy requiring academics to publish data and information about their experiments.” (Sarah Kuta, The Daily Camera). “ How should we treat science’s growing pains?” asks Jerome Ravitz. “A university investigation into an academic, demoted after publishing research into racism on Brisbane buses, was so “infected by error” as to be useless, a workplace tribunal found.” (Jorge Branco, Brisbane Times). An Army buddy’s call for help sent a biophysicist on a quest to understand brain injury, Jon Hamilton of NPR reports. What university title and salary would you like? You can have virtually any, thanks to this site. “Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women?” A new study in Academic Medicine examines gender differences in contributorship. An analysis shows that “ there are precious few women heading scholarly publishing organizations or their Boards,” writes Alice Meadows. Columbia University broke the embargo on research by some of its scientists, prompting PNAS to lift the embargo early. How well do scientific collaborations work? It depends, according to a new paper in Scientometrics. “ Notable cases of misconduct in oncology,” from Ajai Raj, Clinical Oncology News. Researchers have made a breakthrough in public relations, promoting a study before it appears, says Andrew Gelman. “Yesterday I made the decision to formally withdraw a chapter from an edited volume about themes for teaching Introductory Psychology,” writes Rajiv Jhangiani. It’s time for science to evolve its way out of bad patterns, argue our co-founders in STAT. Emilie Marcus, the editor of Cell, has a lot of questions about preprints. “Fraud, bureaucracy and an obsession with quantity over quality still hold Chinese science back,” writes The Economist. 
#HIVEBENCH ELSEVIER HOW TO#
Here’s how to handle an idiotic review, from Stephen Heard.The week at Retraction Watch featured the corrections of papers claiming that conservative beliefs were linked to psychotic traits, and a new member of our leaderboard, from philosophy.
0 kommentar(er)
